varius2: juli 2010

zaterdag 31 juli 2010

OIL SPILL NEWS THAT YOU HAVEN"T SEEN AND NEVER WILL ON MSM

Oil Spill news that you haven''t seen. And never will on MSM. << 1 2 3 4 >>

Topic started on 31-7-2010 @ 12:44 AM by DrJay1975
+12 more Man, I drove to Destin fron Nawlins this week for a convention. I decided to ride the coast and see what the effects were since I haven't been in a few weeks. Thought it would be a good idea since they said they couldn't find any oil. The marshes some 1 mile from the coast(Mississippi), have a layer of what looks like pudding over the grasses. Booms were overun. Helicopters everywhere, no workers in the area. I can't imagine how some of these marshes will ever recover in my lifetime. I stopped an walked up to one of the areas just past Mobile. Unreal, with a gloved hand you have to exert some force to push through the layer of crude, 6 inches thick. Below it, nothing. Everythings dying underneath. No sunlight penetrates it. Normally you see minnow, birds, bugs, tadpoles all kinds of stuff in this brackish marsh. Nothing. Death. Very sad. Drove over the beach into Destin, which is a very populated visible area, very different from where I just stopped. As soon as you cross the bridge, huge cleanup crews. Here they are picking up tarballs, unlike orange beach, that story will blow your mind. But they have booms and boats everywhere puttin on a show here. Nothing but the occasional tarball. Until I stepped out on my balcony. Hmm I've never seen the water look like this. Beautiful blue, except from the beach out about 50 yards. Weird green algae bloom. Never seen that here. Very thick. Authorities say it's seaweed. Nope. Looks like the same green algae you'd see in a small stagnant pond. Seaweed my butt. I wonder what Corexant does to the PH of the water. Could that have caused the algae bloom? Spending the weekend at Perdido Beach with the family. It's between Perdido Key and Orange Beach, Alabama. Water looks ok, until you get in. It's like putting your foot in a bathtub full of bubblebath and baby oil. Hard to get that off your foot. We'll be staying in the pools for the weekend. Friend has a 2 million dollar house on the bay. Just found out it was going to be condemned because of oil penetration into the ground. WTH? Also found out they've taken all of the sea turtle eggs to the east coast of Florida. Not good news for this area. Yet the beaches are open? Scary for the notsobright folks in the water. Sorry if this read a little choppy. Here's what I'm seeing. BP is wallpapering the beaches with cleanup crews. Anywhere there is a crowd, there is a crew and boats. The areas people don't congregate, some of them don't have booms, and many are simply overun with untreated crude. Helis are spotting it but nothing was being done. Can't see anything to do but burn it. The strange algae bloom you should be able to see on the Destin Beach cameras. And in corexant beaches of Orange Beach the government says cmon in the waters fine, and why people will stay in that water after sticking one foot in and feeling how greasy that water is, makes me wonder. It is clearly petroleum rich. Now this is an area where people will get sick I imagine. Because that water isn't healthy. It's obvious. But the gubment says go swimming. Condemning houses because of oil penetration but the beach is ok, hmmmm. If anyone can offer some insight on this algae bloom I'd appreciate it. I'm most curious about what the crude and dispersants do to the PH of the water. Not something I've heard discussed. But in theory a minor PH shift can cause algae growth. But one thing I will say is there are no dolphins, mullet, bluefish, anything that appears to go near this algae. Birds either. Only seen one type of animal in it. Not the fish, fish are fairly stupid right? Not the birds with brains smaller than a peanut. Not the 2nd smartest animal in the world, the dolphins have split. Only animal in that algae are the talkingmonkeys. Yup the human visitors to the "redneck riviera". Weird, same situation in Perdido. No algae, but nothing but the humans appear to be in the greasy water. Seen fish on the other side of the bay where the water feels cleaner, even saw dolphins. Feels like they've been corralled in this area. I guess they don't know the municipalities are condemning the properties that they are cswimming in front of. Again I apologize for thw writing. But the context was worth putting up with it. I hope. But man oh man. BP is putting on a show. It's kind of like when Iron Man opened. All of the big cities it opened right away. The small town theaters couldn't afford it opening week, so they waited a week beforing buying it. Hmmm studios don't show movies where nobody will watch em, and BP won't show where nobody will see them either.

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/87ym

Book of [Ezekiel] and the detailed description of [UFO and Aliens]

Amplify’d from www.abovetopsecret.com

Book of [Ezekiel] and the detailed description of [UFO and Aliens]

Firstly let's examine what the Book of Ezekiel is:

Ezekiel was a priest living with the Jewish
exiles in Babylon after the taking of Judah and Jerusalem by Babylon, around 580-600 B.C.

www.biblenotes.net...

Let's read now:

Ezekiel 1:4 (NIV)

I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north--an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the
fire looked like glowing metal

Is he describing a space craft?

Ezekiel 1:5 (NIV)

and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was that of a man

This doesn't mean they were living creatures, he is simply describing what he is seeing. He is saying that the UFO looked like four living
creatures. It gave him that appearance.

Ezekiel 1:6 (NIV)

but each of them had four faces and four wings

He is describing the UFO.

Ezekiel 1:7 (NIV)

Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze.

Continues the description, this is when I suspect the UFO was landing.

Ezekiel 1:8 (NIV)

Under their wings on their four sides they had the hands of a man. All four of them had faces and wings,

Robotic arms?

Ezekiel 1:9 (NIV)

and their wings touched one another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved.

Ahh hard to understand what he is describing now.

Ezekiel 1:10 (NIV)

Their faces looked like this: Each of the four had the face of a man, and on the right side each had the face of a lion, and on the left the face of
an ox; each also had the face of an eagle.

Ezekiel 1:11 (NIV)

Such were their faces. Their wings were spread out upward; each had two wings, one touching the wing of another creature on either side, and two wings
covering its body.

Ezekiel 1:12 (NIV)

Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, without turning as they went.

Ezekiel 1:13 (NIV)

The appearance of the living creatures was like burning coals of fire or like torches. Fire moved back and forth among the creatures; it was bright,
and lightning flashed out of it.

Ezekiel 1:14 (NIV)

The creatures sped back and forth like flashes of lightning.

Ezekiel 1:15 (NIV)

As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces.

There it goes, the wheels are out. What they had definition of, they tried to define, what they didn't, they simply described with their mentality of
that age.

Ezekiel 1:16-21 (NIV)

This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like chrysolite, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel
intersecting a wheel. As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not turn about as the
creatures went. Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around. When the living creatures moved, the wheels beside
them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels
would rise along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. When the creatures moved, they also moved; when the
creatures stood still, they also stood still; and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels rose along with them, because the spirit of the
living creatures was in the wheels.

Enjoy

Goo to google and type the book of ezekiel to read the whole book.

Edit to add:

The main thing to understand is that he defined things which he saw, for example wheels, because he knew what a wheel was, what the definition for
that object was, but he didn't know the rest so merely gave us a description of what it looked like.

Very interesting indeed since the rest didn't have any definition at his time. I can imagine if we saw it at this time, we would understand and
define everything and what it looked like in a much easier manner. And would understand it also since we have advanced technologically in all
areas.

[edit on 31-7-2010 by oozyism]

See more at www.abovetopsecret.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/87w7

VODPOD

Watch videos at Vodpod.

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/87ru

vrijdag 30 juli 2010

AQUARIUS THE AGE OF EVIL

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/86pt

dinsdag 27 juli 2010

WikiLeaks Creates Fresh Doubt About Afghan War, Secrets

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com

WikiLeaks Creates Fresh Doubt About Afghan War, Secrets

Read More:
Afghan War Diary, Afghanistan, Afghanistan War, Afghanistan War Diary, Afghanistan War Logs, Afpak, Civilian Deaths, Julian Assange, Military, Nato, Pakistan, Pakistan Taliban, Taliban, War Logs, Wikileaks, Wikileaks Afghan War Diary, WikiLeaks Afghanistan, World News,

World News

WASHINGTON (Associated Press) - The monumental leak of classified Afghan war documents threatened Monday to create deeper doubts about the war at home, cause new friction with Pakistan over allegations about its spy agency and raise questions around the world about Washington's own ability to protect military secrets.

The White House called the disclosures "alarming."

The torrent of more than 91,000 secret documents, one of the largest unauthorized disclosures in military history, sent the Obama administration scrambling to assess and repair any damage to the war effort, either abroad or in the U.S. The material could reinforce the view put forth by the war's opponents in Congress that one of the nation's longest conflicts is hopelessly stalemated.

The leaks come at a time when President Barack Obama's Afghanistan war strategy is under congressional scrutiny and with polls finding that a majority of Americans no longer think the war there is worth fighting. Still, the leaks are not expected to prevent passage of a $60 billion war funding bill. Despite strong opposition among liberals who see Afghanistan as an unwinnable quagmire, House Democrats must either approve the bill before leaving at the end of this week for a six-week vacation, or commit political suicide by leaving troops in the lurch in war zones overseas.

U.S. Army Spc. Brad Parrish, of Spokane, Wash., from the 1-320th Alpha Battery, 2nd Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division, talks with an Afghan villager during a patrol near COP Nolen, in the volatile Arghandab Valley, Kandahar, Afghanistan, Monday, July 26, 2010. (AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)

The Pentagon also was looking at possible damage on the ground in Afghanistan.

"Someone inadvertently or on purpose gave the Taliban its new 'enemies list,'" declared Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who said the White House indicated the disclosures compromised a number of Afghan sources.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs emphasized that the documents covered the period before Obama ordered a major increase in U.S. troops fighting in Afghanistan, and the administration denied they would cause any policy shift in the fight against Taliban insurgents.

Story continues below

Indeed, despite the furor over the publication of the reports on the WikiLeaks whistleblower website, the information did not reveal any fundamentally new problems in the war effort. Military officers, current and former, described the documents as mostly tactical spot reports, including hunches about possible suspects and bomb plots that couldn't be verified. Some of the reports contain errors; others appear to be based on flimsy evidence.

Still, much of the material is anything but encouraging.

Underscoring the difficulties the U.S. faces, the documents include the first publicly released indication that the Taliban has used portable surface-to-air missiles against U.S. helicopters. One report on a June 2005 incident said a Black Hawk helicopter used evasive measures to avoid getting hit east of Kandahar by what its crew chief identified as a portable missile.

The documents also report potential Iranian support of an Afghan terrorist group.

They said that on Jan. 30, 2005, Iranian intelligence agencies brought the equivalent of $212,800 in Afghan currency across the Iranian border and transferred it to a 1990s-model white Toyota Corolla station wagon occupied by members of Hizb-i-Islami, a Taliban-allied insurgent group led by former Afghan Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The money trail was lost.

Col. Dave Lapan, a Defense Department spokesman, said the military would probably need "days, if not weeks" to determine "the potential damage to the lives of our service members and coalition partners."

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said the release of documents was just the beginning. He told reporters in London that some 15,000 more files on Afghanistan were still being vetted by his organization.

The documents are described as battlefield reports compiled by various military units that provide an unflinching view of combat operations between 2004 and 2009, including U.S. frustration over reports that Pakistan secretly aided insurgents fighting U.S. and Afghan forces.

The material portrays Pakistan as playing a double game when it came to the struggle against Afghan militants, with security officials secretly providing insurgents with aid. Both the U.S. and Pakistan say that view is outdated, but one American analyst said it probably is correct.

"The Pakistan government gave up claiming that it could control its intelligence agencies around the time they invented them. I don't think they even try," said Paula R. Newberg, director of the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy at Georgetown University.

In Islamabad, the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs called the leaked documents "misplaced, skewed and contrary to the factual position on the ground." And it said that U.S.-Pakistani counterterrorism cooperation against "our common enemies" will continue.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley argued that there is a "new dynamic" in the U.S. relationship with Afghanistan and Pakistan since the period covered by the leaked documents. He acknowledged, however, that the U.S. remains concerned about weaknesses in the relationship, including the problem of corruption in the Afghan government.

"These documents highlight issues we've long known about," Crowley said.

WikiLeaks, a self-described whistleblower organization, posted the reports to its website Sunday night. It did not say who provided the documents.

Crowley said it was unclear whether the leak was related to a U.S. military intelligence analyst who is being held in Kuwait, on charges of mishandling classified information on military computers in Baghdad.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said the documents released so far "reflect the reality, recognized by everyone, that the insurgency was gaining momentum during these years while our coalition was losing ground."

The Taliban's resurgence led Obama to announce in December 2009 a major increase of forces to Afghanistan as part of a new civil-military strategy, Lieberman pointed out.

Shortly after the documents were posted on the Internet, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said they raised questions about whether the U.S. was pursuing a realistic policy with Afghanistan and Pakistan. He said they showed the urgency of making the "calibrations" necessary "to get the policy right."

Sen. Kit Bond of Missouri, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called the leak disturbing.

"The damage to our national security caused by leaks like this won't stop until we see more perpetrators in orange jump suits," Bond said.

The military has detained Bradley Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst in Baghdad, for allegedly transmitting classified information. But the latest documents could have come from anyone with a secret-level clearance, Lapan said.
Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/8395

How to wake people up without turning yourself into a social outcast

Amplify’d from www.hangedmanproject.com

home

mission statement

declaration of individual independence

documentation

forums

contact

support

links

How to wake people up without turning yourself into a social outcast

Readers of this particular website have probably all been there before: you try very hard to convince a family member, a friend or someone you know from work that the real world isn’t quite as is shown on television or through other forms of mainstream brainwashing and that it would be a wise decision for your subject to inform him or herself about what their reality is actually made up of. You timed all of your convincing statements and quotes just right and knew exactly what documentaries this truth heathen should have a look at. But somehow you still end up with someone staring you in the eyes emptily, confused, bewildered and getting ready to run for safer places any moment now, if the running didn’t already happen. Mission failed. Miserably.

Simple fact: trying to open other people’s eyes by confronting them with the possibility that they might be the main subject of a future genocide, that reptilian entities could be out for their life’s energy or that HAARP will most likely fry their brain if some freak scientists and fascist governments get their way, are just not good ways of waking your fellow sleepy human beings up. Common citizens see James Bond-style action movie scenery flash before their eyes as soon as you mention secretive meetings of world leaders at this mystery place called Bohemian Grove and will most likely conclude that you must be high on some sort of illegal substance. Waking somebody up by emptying a bucket of icy water over their head while they are in their REM sleep is not a productive approach. Subtlety is.

What do almost all of us have in common, something which we are confronted with on a daily basis and something that really concerns us? The need for good food. We all eat and nearly all of us have the tendency to want the best for ourselves in order to preserve our health. I’ve found that – after having hit the concrete wall of disbelief many, many times before – telling people what’s actually in their food is a great way of getting your message across, of getting rid of at least some of the propaganda people’s realities are built upon and with that, hopefully allowing the seed of independent thinking to sprout and grow to its full potential.

In this article I will use the European situation as an example because I myself happen to be part of the Fourth Reich and I’ll therefore mostly be talking about so called E-numbers. These numbers are nothing more than codes representing mostly unpronounceable ingredients better known as additives. In our modern world, we no longer need to cherish the illusion that food bought from local supermarkets actually deserves to be called food. It’s doesn’t. Almost everything edible you buy nowadays is infested with additives to enhance flavor, appearance, preservability or to simply start a chemical siege on your brain, forcing it to consume even more. And this, dear readers, is a great way to slightly open up the gates to healthy and free thinking.

The next time you see a good but slumbering friend devour some shiny red candy for example, have a look and see if the product happens to contain Carmine or E-120, as it is labeled over here. If so, ask your friend if he or she enjoys eating the reddish colored residue of crushed and boiled dried insects. Most friends don’t. Then, explain to them it has been scientifically proven that Carmine can cause hyperactivity, asthma, eczema, insomnia and that new studies show it could even be carcinogenic.

Another “fun” one is l-cysteine or E-920. This is mostly used to enhance the structure of foods like bread and is usually made from… animal hair. If you thought you were a vegetarian, better think twice. You could just as well have been eating animal products without even knowing it. You gotta love the food industry, right? By the way, stay away from things like gummy candy, marshmallows and lots of desserts too if you love animals, because E-441 – a main ingredient of the products mentioned - is nothing more than gelatin, which is derived from the collagen inside animals’ skins and bones. Yummy.

While there aren’t many negative side effects known (yet) for the ingestion of E-920 besides the fact that the idea of eating processed animal hair is usually considered to be pretty much disgusting, E-441 is more tricky, even if you’re not a vegetarian: this substance is sometimes known to contain traces of yet another additive, one that goes by the name of Mono-sodium Glutamate, also better known as MSG or E-621. And this is where things start to get really nasty.

MSG or E-621 is a synthetic flavor enhancer that has some extra “benefits”. One of those so-called benefits is that it is also a neurotoxin that can affect neurons in your brain in a severe manner. The effects of this neurotoxin can be experienced pretty easily: ask your friend if he or she ever opened a bag of chips, ate some of the potato goodness and suddenly found him or herself frantically devouring every last crumb as if it were the best thing anyone could ever have. That’s the effect of MSG on your brain: you think you just want more and more.

And it gets even worse: MSG can be found in tons of things and has become very hard not to be present in the stuff you consume. It’s in soup, chips, ready-to-eat meals, diet products and just about anything else you could put in your mouth and chew on. Which, if you ask me, is a terrible thing. As I said, MSG forces people to eat more because the toxin messes up the inner workings of your brain in a very bad way, resulting in even more people getting obese due to the simple fact that they just can’t stop eating. And as if that wasn’t bad enough, there’s this other thing that you should avoid as if it were leprosy: light products.

If you really feel like poisoning yourself, buy products that are both “light” and contain flavor enhancers like MSG. This way, your brain just keeps on wanting more of the product; a product that has had E-951 or Aspartame added to it, an additive that has (in scientific literature over the last forty years) been proven to be nothing more than a really destructive poison, again corrupting the way your brain works and causing cancer in just about all test subjects. “Light products” will indeed make you lose weight, but only after you die a horrible death.

The only reason these poisons like MSG or Aspartame appear in our foods, is because the food industry wants them to be in there. Additives are usually way cheaper than genuine ingredients so there’s a lot more profit to be made selling synthesized “food”. And it’s of course also desirable to have people eat more and more of your products, so adding MSG and thereby stimulating consumers’ appetite can only be a good thing. And here – finally! - comes the actual argument that usually wakes up people pretty damn well: all these poisons have been approved by our governments. In Europe, the E in E-numbers stands for “Approved by the European Union as being safe to consume”. In the US there’s the FDA who also has no problems approving ingredients that should never have made their way to the food market. It’s all about the money. It’s business as usual.

With this realization, a lot of people who otherwise would never have listened to anything you have to say, will now usually start to feel a bit uncomfortable. And that’s basically all that is needed to get people to think more independently. As soon as they themselves see that governments and corporations are nothing more than the same nasty and greedy monster and that this monster does not care about human or any life at all, eyes do start to open. I have used this approach for some time now and I have achieved quite a high success rate. Of course there are always people that have been conditioned and indoctrinated so badly that they just won’t comprehend anything you have to say, but for most humanoids, showing them how their food is actually not really food anymore but some synthesized pile of poisoned garbage that was approved by their governments, is a great start-up for getting the road to true freedom paved.

Read more at www.hangedmanproject.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/837f

maandag 26 juli 2010

MYSTERIOUS ORIGINS OF MAN

Amplify’d from www.mcremo.com

NBC's Mysterious Origins of Man

JUNE 1996 NBC PRESS RELEASE: CONTROVERSY SURROUNDS THE MYSTERIOUS ORIGINS OF MAN UNIVERSITY PROFS WANT SPECIAL BANNED FROM THE AIRWAVES

Program that Dares to Challenge Accepted Beliefs About Pre-Historic Man to be Rebroadcast June 8 on NBC

On February 25, 1996 NBC aired a one-hour prime-time special, The Mysterious Origins of Man, hosted by Charlton Heston. Controversy exploded in the academic community following this telecast. Much of the material for the program was taken from Forbidden Archeology,featuring interviews with co-authors Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson on the show.

Watch a video clip of The Mysterious Origins of Man (MOM) in Realvideo format! This is in REAL time - no waiting - no uploading of files!

To order MOM videos, go to ORDER INFO

The Mysterious Origins of Man was produced by the BC VIDEO team: Bill Cote, Carol Cote and John Cheshire.

Copyright 1995 Carol Cot

The grooved spheres from South Africa, found in strata dating 2.3 billion years old, were featured on NBC's Mysterious Origins of Man.

NEW! Special 3-dvd Expanded Edition of The Mysterious Origins of Man, featuring over four hours of uncut bonus interviews with Michael Cremo, Dr. Richard Thompson, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock and others. Includes The Mysterious Origins of Man, MOM Companion dvd and Jurassic Art.

DVD 4 hours

Special limited time offer beginning on February 16, 2008!
The first 108 customers who order the MOM Expanded Edition
will receive a free gift

$49.95 Click Here to Order

1. Evolutionary Pathways MP3 audio interview with Michael Cremo
and Dr. Obidike Kamau on the Self Determination radio show - 2 hours

2. Atlantis Rising magazine, featuring Michael Cremo's monthly
Forbidden Archeologist column

3. Bhagavad Gita As It Is book with translations and purports by A.C.
Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

4. Assorted imported incense

JUNE 1996 NBC PRESS RELEASE:

Controversy exploded in the academic community with the telecast of The Mysterious Origins of Man last February. Professors of science and anthropology from some of the nation's most prestigious colleges and universities voiced strong opinions about the validity of the special, which challenged long-accepted beliefs about man's beginning.

The program presents evidence suggesting that man may have made the climb from Stone Age to civilization more than once; that present-day man is just the latest in this cycle; and that Darwin's Theory of Evolution has some serious flaws.

"We expected some controversy when we produced this show," says producer Bill Cote, "but were not prepared for the enormous cry of outrage from some members of the scientific community."

Copyright Carol Cote 1995

Charlton Heston: "We've seen a broad range of evidence, some of it highly speculative. But there are enough well documented cases to call for a closer look at the conventional explanation of man's origins."

The following are excerpts from more than 250 email messages that flooded MOM Producer Bill Cote's website (http://www.bcvideo.com) in response to the show:

"I wanted to take this opportunity to commend you on your COURAGE in producing such a show. I know from personal experience the depth of passion raised when you question the Theory of Evolution. My problem with the people with whom I have debated on the subject is not so much that they believe what it is they do, but that they are so damn dogmatic about it. In many ways, the scientific establishment has become the secular analogue to the adherence to orthodoxy which they so claim to despise in favor of their freedom to question everything. Apparently, that freedom stops when one begins to question THEIR most cherished beliefs. I applaud you."

(MB, Winchester, MO)

"Shame on you. I watched your show, The Mysterious Origins of Man on Sunday night. It left me horrified, angry and depressed. I remember as a child, Sunday night was a family night in front of TV; NBC's Wild Kingdom and The Wonderful World of Disney....You would be astounded by how little Americans do know about human evolution and now we'll have millions of American children believing that man lived beside dinosaurs when in reality we are separated by 60 MILLION YEARS...."
(KC, Northwestern University)

"Fantastic show! It is about time alternative interpretations and hidden evidence is brought out into the open for the public to see for itself. The response from the scientific type community is expected because it shows a lack of rigor on their part. The last thing they want to look like is incompetent or worse, not objective. Please don't let anything or anyone stop you in the future from airing shows that present alternative views. Thank you."
(DH)

"I missed the first showing of "The Mysterious Origins of Man" and would like to know when and if there are any plans to rebroadcast. I was able to read a review in the electronic newsletter ISCNI*FLASH. I enjoy this type of programming. It is very refreshing to be informed of alternate points of view. I have a degree in Geology and found early, when a student, that the establishment would ignore the evidence if it didn't fit their preconceived ideas. Keep up the good work."
(DE)

"I just read your response to the earlier criticism of your show, and find your track-covering pathetically amusing. Standing on your hight horse tisk-tasking the establishment, all giddy about the furer you kicked up, cleverly knocking down all your straw men. Yes, all we scientists have been misleading ourselves and everyone else for years! We ruthlessly squash dissent from our all-powerful theory of evolution! Give it up. You wanted money, and you wanted ratings, you wanted scientists to respond, and you got it..."
(HF, Scientist and Human Being)

"I thought it was an excellent program.....I kept thinking to myself, 'At last, they are starting to present to the *uninformed* American public many of the strange, inconsistent, and *unpublished* conclusions of the evidence found, or known about from scholarly interpretations of ancient sacred writings."
(HW)

"I am truly dismayed at this particularly steamy pile of rodent remains. What your program presented as 'very reliable alternative theories' are nothing but bizarre speculations by people whose only gain must be by selling a book..."
(CB, Canadian Academic)

"Please don't let the scientific community dictate what information the receptive public receives....The scientific community tends to reject anything it doesn't understand or can't reconstruct or objectively prove in the laboratory. There are many more open-minded professionals and individuals who do not have such biases and welcome information such as you have apparently presented. Freedom of information should not be restricted by such prejudice. Thank you for your initiative."
(BS, Attorney at Law)

"...Your network has done a great disservice by airing this pseudoscientific garbage. It is disheartening to think of how many people watched Mysterious Origins in a prime Sunday evening slot, while truly high quality programs such as Nova and Nature are relegated to much smaller audiences on PBS..."
(JK, New Mexico State University)

"...I have never seen such unadulterated hogwash in my entire life....If you present outrageous theories, then you must present someone with an opposing view to create a balanced presentation. If you cannot present this type of an investigation, then you should be forced to have a flashing graphic saying 'Entertainment Value Only', just like the Psychic Friends network has to do. I will be writing to my congressional delegation, the FCC, and the President to argue that legislation should exist to force you to do this....."
(TH, New Mexico State University)

"...I will be boycotting all of the sponsors of this program, and I will be encouraging others to do the same. I *don't* encourage censorship of this type of thing. In fact, I would encourage science teachers to show this program in their classrooms, followed by a thorough debunking...."
(TL)

For more information about this program and the scientific controversy it provoked, contact BCVIDEO.com.
Read more at www.mcremo.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/8251

zaterdag 24 juli 2010

Censored Gulf news: Scientists call on Obama to stop chem-spray

Professional and public outcry must be heard through halls of BP and the hill to stop spraying.

Chemical dispersants being released near Houma, Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico

Photo: USCG/1planet1ocean

"National and international professional and public outcry must be heard through halls of the White House to immediately stop chem-spraying in the Gulf of Mexico region and globally." - Deborah Dupre', B.Sci., MA.Sci., D.C.E., QMHP

"[B]y dispersing the oil throughout the water column, this practice is making it impossible to recover the dispersed oil at the surface while plumes of the dispersed oil remain at depth, entering the food chain at many levels where it will bioaccumulate as it moves up the food chain. Dispersing the oil means more of it will likely travel with prevailing currents to destinations downstream, including Cuba, Mexico, the Florida Keys, and the eastern seaboard of the United States." - Scientists Consensus Statement on the Use of Dipersants in the Gulf of Mexico, David E. Guggenheim, Ph.D.

Photo: The Ocean Doctor, 1planet1ocean

Censored Gulf dispersant news: Aerial spraying act of war Pt I

Gassed in the Gulf (Part I): BP Gulf War Syndrome

Censored Gulf news: Death by dispersant, Nadler bill to stop slow-kill

Censored Gulf oil news: Americans aerial sprayed, coated with poison (must see Video)

Censored Gulf dispersant news: Act of war (Pt II) The art of chemical warfare

Scientists and public demand ending human rights violations in Gulf of Mexico region.

Over 100 scientists and academic institution, research laboratory, conservation organization leaders plushuman rights defenders from as far away as Norway and Greece signed the Scientists Consensus Statement on the Use of Chemical Dispersants in the Gulf of Mexicocalling for the Obama Administration toimmediately halt chemical aerial spraying in the Gulf region. A public petition to end dispersant use is also gaining momentum.

Non-consensual human experiementation

Scientists expressing grave concern about theunprecedented aerial spraying of chemical dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico region believe a large-scale, uncontrolled non-consensual human and environmental experiment is being conducted in the Gulf region according to reports sent to the writer including one from the "Ocean Doctor" David E. Guggenheim, Ph.D.

Guggenheim is president of 1planet1ocean, a project of The Ocean Foundation of which he is a Senior Fellow.

"Corexit aerial sprayed is one of the most toxic dispersants and one of the least effective on Louisiana crude oil," states Guggenheim.

"The mixture of Corexit and oil represents an even greater threat as the toxic effects are magnified according to independent scientists and researchers,"

Guggenheim is inviting more scientists to support the immediate halt of the chemical spraying.

"The dispersant-oil mixture is killing marine wildlife, including dolphins, whales and fish, while also causing a range of serious human health effects to those who have been exposed," reads part of the statement that 1plant1ocean is calling more scientists to sign. (Emphasis added)

The statement calls on the "Obama Administration, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, to immediately halt the use of chemical dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico."

Gathering more evidence with NBC

Sunday, Guggenheim and Dr. Susan Shaw, Director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute, Blue Hill, Maine, were out on a boat in the Gulf region taking water, oyster and fish samples for analysis.

"We are especially interested in analysis of the toxic effects of the mixture of dispersant and oil," stated Guggenheim.

An NBC camera crew was with the two scientists and Guggenheim says it will soon be airing its reports.

Guggenhem recently interviewed Shaw on his Ocean Doctor radio program archived at http://www.oceandoctor.org/the-deadly-truth-about-dispersants-in-the-gulf-the-ocean-doctor-on-webtalkradio-net/

Military-Corporate Aerial Spraying Agenda

The BP-military Gulf of Mexico catastrophe results from what is called ENMOD, "Environmental modification techniques". ENMOD refers to any technique for changing - through deliberate manipulation of natural processes - the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space. (Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva: 18 May 1977 cited in What are environmental modification techniques? Human Rights info 101, Dupre, Examiner, Dec. 6. 2009)

Chemical aerial spraying, also called "chemtrailing," is technically called Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG). Geoengineering, the artificial modification of the earth's climate systems, is anenvironment modification (ENMOD) science for "deliberate manipulation of natural processes - the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space that can be applied as a weapon of mass destruction." This is being applied in the Gulf of Mexico region by both drilling into the earth floor, pouring chemicals into the hole, and the ongoing chemical aerial spraying.

Geoengineer projects range from declassified experimentation, such as dumping particles into oceans to attract algae that sequesters carbon and theoretically slows global warming, to highly classified experimentation, such as aerosol spraying according to Professor Michel Chossudovsky.

In a Febraury, 2010 Examiner article focusing on geoengineering, the writer quoted Michel Chossudovsky:

...environmental manipulations as part of a military agenda, while formally acknowledged by official government documents and the US military, has never been considered relevant... Military analysts are mute on the subject. Meteorologists are not investigating the matter, and environmentalists are strung on global warming and the Kyoto protocol." (Michel Chossudovsky,Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and Climate Change, Global Research, December 5, 2009; Also see D. Dupre, A gory truth about climate change mind control, Examiner, December 6, 2009)

The 1planet1ocean intitative has local and global relevance to exposing the military environmental manipulations to reach the Pentagon's stated goal of "Full Spectrum Dominance." To resist this untoward military goal, unity is needed.

Solidarity is urgently needed with people being aerially sprayed with chemicals not only in the Gulf of Mexico region, but throughout the planet. If anything positive can emerge from the crime against humanity being perpetrated in the Gulf of Mexico Region, perhaps it will be the strengthening of the human family in its struggle to end aerial chemical spraying.

Copyright DeborahDupre' July 20, 2010. All rights reserved.

(Note: The author grants permission to post this article's title and first 2 paragraphs linked to this original article on Examiner.)

Learn more by doing

Download the Scientist Consensus Statement (PDF) and sign the statement by entering your name and institution information at 1planet1ocean.

If you are not a scientist or leader of an academic institution, research laboratory or conservation organization, please sign on the public petition against continued use of chemical dispersants.

Urgent support needed: Please support Orleans Barefoot Doctors who are distributing Toxic Survival Kits in New Orleans. Email kdlabarre@gmail.com for information about how to sendbaking soda, home-made respirators plus printer ink for life-saving information in each kit. The address is: Hearn/Koizumi Center

2881 Maurepas Street

New Orleans Louisiana 70119

For better understanding of the Gulf of Mexico region PMIC (petrochemical-military-industrial complex) operation, see the following articles provided by Geoenegineer Watch:

Evergreen Air and Secret Chemtrail Facililty

Inside the Covert Aerosol Geoengineering Program +

HANDS OFF MOTHER EARTH

Join the campaign to stop geoengineering experiments

United Nations science body calls for halt on climate-hacking experiments

List of Countries Using Covert Geoengineering

Smearing the sky

Secret US/UN Geoengineering Experiment Revealed Still Exists Over Cairo, Egypt

Ongoing Aerosol Geoengineering-

Tanker Enemy has captured the technology of the program Geoengineers deny is real.

Messing With Disaster

Venezuelian Journalist Reveals Global Aerosol Crimes Are Ongoing, Scientists Deny

TV Weatherman Exposes Covert Aerosol chaff program Covert geoengineering?

G. Edward Griffin Talks Candidly About Aerosol Geoengineering/SAG

Eyes Wide Shut: Disease and Death from the Sky

Chemtrails: Are they fact or fiction? (Video)

Geo-Engineering Watch Communiqué to the World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth Here is the same communique' in Spanish.

What in the World Are They Spraying? Part 1 Part II and Mike Murphy's newest article What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum? and a new video.

History Channel Documentary on weather modification for military purposes including "chemtrails", "HAARP". Parts 1, 2, 3(chemtrails), 4

Geo-engineering The Truth What You Are Breathing and the Ability to Deploy

Connecting the dots between HAARP, CHEMtrails and our water.

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/80yr

Wonderen van ons zonstelsel : Aliens (documentaire BBC)

Amplify’d from tunnelforce9.wazzup.nl

Wonderen van ons zonstelsel : Aliens (documentaire BBC)

professor Brian Cox brengt ons in deze prachtige documentaire van de BBC op de hoogte van de vooruitgangen in het onderzoek naar buitenaards leven in ons eigen zonstelsel.